December 2016

This post was originally published on this site

Post Summary: 

Our writer Shaun Kempston and his wife are very close to having a New Year Baby!

Hear from Shaun about this new addition-to-be for their family and how they’ve gone about choosing her name. And along the way, meet some of the babies we’ve met around the world in 2016.

January 1st and this whole New Year business got some people thinking about the first babies of the year. Since my wife is very pregnant and everyone else is on vacation, they thought I might have something worthwhile to share. They said, “Just be yourself.” And I said, “That is probably not a good idea.” So take everything you read with a light heart.

Everybody loves babies, right?


This post was originally published on this site

Post Summary: 

Many young women in rural Africa face difficult futures: of early marriage, young motherhood, limited education, and meager livings.

But not Modester.

At 18, Modester is one of the top students in all of Zambia! She’s headed for university and whatever big dream she may have in mind.

See what made the difference for her.

When I think of Modester, a girl I met in Sinazongwe, Zambia in the spring of this year, I imagine a girl—her head held high, shoulders back, standing where the dirt road branches into a Y.

Down one path: a life of early marriage, young motherhood, lack of education, maybe hunger, and more than likely physical labor trying to eke out a meager living.


This post was originally published on this site

Post Summary: 

Patricia Heaton’s sponsored child, Gracious, doesn’t have electricity, so she’s never seen Patricia on TV in shows like ABC’s The Middle.

To Gracious, Patricia Heaton is a superstar because she’s her sponsor!

Travel to Zambia today with Patricia as she meets Gracious and sees the impact of World Vision’s work.

I have been a fan of Patricia Heaton since her days on the television show, Everybody Loves Raymond. She plays a character named Debra Barone, a non-Italian wife trying to fit into an Italian family. My husband Tom and I used to laugh at the show because it so brilliantly represents the fun and frustration of combining two different cultures in a marriage. Tom is an East Coast Italian. I am a West Coast Scandinavian. We sometimes have issues.


This post was originally published on this site


By Laura A. Dean, Guest Blogger*

Georgia voters decidedly adopted constitutional Amendment 2, the so called Safe Harbor Act by proponents and “pole tax” by opponents on Tuesday, November 8. With over 83 percent of the vote in favor, this amendment was approved with a higher percentage than any other constitutional amendment on the ballot in what proponents argued was a true bipartisan grassroots effort. The amendment to the Constitution of Georgia earmarks monetary penalties for perpetrators of certain sex crimes and assessments on adult entertainment establishments in order to fund the Safe Harbor for Sexually Exploited Children Fund.  The fund will pay for rehabilitative and social services for sexually exploited children in the State of Georgia.

Despite the overwhelming support of 3.2 million Georgians, the local anti-trafficking movement, non-governmental organizations, Rotary Clubs, United Way, the Junior League of Atlanta, and churches around the state, this amendment is not without controversy and criticism. Proponents of the bill argued that the amendment was necessary in order to create a specific revenue stream for sexually exploited children that can withstand state budget crises and to assist victims of trafficking, which they refer to as an epidemic.

Human Trafficking Statistics

Statistics on human trafficking are often cited in the media and by anti-trafficking advocates to demonstrate the necessity of action on this issue. Atlanta has been categorized as a “Human Trafficking Hub” and the FBI named Atlanta as one of 14 cities in the nation with the highest incidence of children exploited in prostitution.  But concrete numbers on this phenomenon are difficult to discern. Additionally, the numbers cited by many in the anti-trafficking movement are often flawed, unsubstantiated, or misinterpreted.

Literature from the campaign stated that Atlanta leads the nation in profits generated from the illicit sex trade. This statistic references the Urban Institute study that looked at the sex trade in eight major American cities and found that Atlanta had the largest commercial sex trade between 2003 and 2007. The data from this study were focused on the underground commercial sex trade, however the wording is changed in the Amendment 2 literature to “illicit,” in order to focus on the criminal aspects of the sex trade. The amendment literature also states that this information is current and immediate but the data from the study are almost a decade old and likely do not properly reflect the phenomenon today.

Scope and Disbursement Issues

Moving beyond the statistics, the type of victim that can receive assistance from this fund is also problematic since it is aimed at child victims of sex trafficking and leaves out labor trafficking victims, adult victims that cannot prove force or coercion to qualify legally for assistance, LGBTQ victims, and many other types of victims that do not fit into the narrow category outlined in the amendment.

Another problematic element of Amendment 2 is that the dispersion of the funds and how they will be used is unclear. According to the Safe Harbor website “agencies, faith-based organizations and non-profits that provide services to child victims of sex trafficking will be able to apply for funds. A new commission, appointed by the General Assembly and the Governor, will develop guidelines and oversee the distribution of monies to ensure they are used where they can have the greatest impact.” Thus, despite laying the groundwork for this amendment since 2009, anti-trafficking advocates have yet to decide the  commission’s membership and how the annual estimated $2 million dollars in revenue from this amendment will be spent.

Taking a Critical View

Critics of the constitutional amendment have labeled it as a government money grab targeting strip clubs because they are an easy target and some have threatened to sue if the amendment was adopted. Others have argued that the Amendment’s funding stream lumps legal businesses in with criminals and makes strip club owners pay for the state’s child sex trafficking efforts. Even the NAACP Georgia initially came out in opposition to Amendment 2 because it was a gimmick creating surcharges on unrelated businesses that will be passed on to lower income Georgians. They changed their views in November because the funds will be permanently protected and used solely for the purposes of providing restorative services to child victims.

A number of feminist scholars and activists were also opposed to the amendment due to the source of the funds. At the World Summit: End Sexual Exploitation hosted by the Carter Center in Atlanta, a presentation on Amendment 2 garnered significant criticism from audience members.  Some claimed the amendment aimed to take money from strip clubs who contribute to human trafficking and use that money to help victims, creating an uncomfortable relationship between the two entities. Other opponents, such as Athens for Everyone, said that that the bill would further marginalize people who work in the sex industry by levying penalties and taxes on them. This effectively hurts exploited people, the same people Amendment 2 purports to help, but only if they fit into the narrow category of victim recognized in the legislation.


Despite the overwhelming approval of Amendment 2 in Georgia there are still a number of controversies with the Safe Harbor Fund. Problematic statistics utilized by proponents added a sense of urgency to the adoption of an amendment that was not entirely thought out and does not serve all of the trafficking victims in Georgia. This urgency led voters to approve fines of $5,000 per year or one percent of adult entertainment business revenue, whichever is greater, into a state fund only for child victims of sex trafficking. This fund has no guidance on how the revenue will be spent beyond rehabilitation services and does not address the underlying causes of trafficking such as poverty, abuse, homelessness and other factors that leave people around the state vulnerable to traffickers in the first place. The new Safe Harbor for Sexually Exploited Children Fund Commission charged with allocating these state funds should look to be more rigorous, transparent, and inclusive with its programming, assistance, and rehabilitation services than Amendment 2 because all of the trafficking victims in Georgia depend on it!


*Laura A. Dean is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Millikin University. She is a member of the Georgia Statewide Human Trafficking Task Force. She blogs at Eastern and tweets @proflauradean.


About the Human Trafficking Center

The Human Trafficking Center, housed in the University of Denver’s Josef Korbel School of International Studies, is the only two-year, graduate-level, professional-training degree in human trafficking in the United States. One way graduate students contribute to the study of human trafficking is by publishing research-based blogs. The HTC was founded in 2002 to apply sound research and reliable methodology to the field of human trafficking research and advocacy.

Founded in 1964, the Josef Korbel School of International Studies is one of the world’s leading schools for the study of international relations. The School offers degree programs in international affairs and is named in honor of its founder and first dean, Josef Korbel.


Note: There is a print link embedded within this post, please visit this post to print it.

This post was originally published on this site

Post Summary: 

After being shunned by her community for being poor, Esnart’s life transformed through the simple gift of chickens.

Now that those who had shunned her need help, see how Esnart’s family is taking the Bible’s lesson of forgiveness to heart!

Forgiveness—the dictionary defines it as to grant absolution for an offense; to pardon. It sounds simple. But can you imagine feeling your community’s rejection year after year … and then being willing to forgive the people who’d rejected you?